13 March 2006
Geneva – 13 March 2006 – The DVB Project
Office reports that the terms proposed for licensing patents essential to the
Multimedia Home Platform have been broadly criticised by DVB members and by
other implementers. The stiff reaction was in response to further terms
announced on 2 March 2006 during
DVB World in Dublin . Some
critics suggest that the royalties proposed will lead implementers to slow the
take-up of the MHP standard.
The
Multimedia Home Platform (MHP) is a specification, adopted by the DVB Project,
accommodating both digital broadcasting and interactivity. MHP set-top boxes
have been introduced throughout Europe , with
strong take-up in Italy . Until
the announcement of terms earlier this month, MHP was scheduled for
introduction in France and Spain . The
standard is also used as the core for consumer devices in US cable
networks and by the Blu-ray Disk Association. Holders of patents essential to
MHP are forming a licensing programme (“patent pool”) and have named Via
Licensing to administer the programme. The terms announced in Dublin by Via
Licensing on behalf of the patent holders can be found at: www.vialicensing.com/news/via_pr_0603_MHP.html.
“In Dublin and
during the past week, I’ve collected a number of highly adverse comments to the
licensing programme,” reported Peter
MacAvock, Executive Director DVB. “I’ve heard that the royalties are too
onerous and don’t reflect the different broadcast distribution patterns within Europe .
Accounting for MHP households as the basis for assessing royalties is unclear,
especially in Europe free-to-air
markets. Also, it’s claimed that the royalties on equipment are too high
compared to the cost of production, at a time when an MHP box ex factory is
approaching € 30. Overall this news must be terribly disheartening to those
markets which are considering the commercialisation of MHP.”
DVB
itself doesn’t express views on commercial terms offered by patent holders, but
collects and forwards on comments of its members and other implementers. It
also provides a forum for discussion of individual views during meetings of its
IPR Module.
Carter
Eltzroth, Legal Director DVB, stated, “DVB has worked hard to promote a
favourable licensing and compliance environment for MHP. It would be extremely
disappointing if the market concludes that the terms required by the MHP pool
block further commercialisation. Also the pool has not yet told us what patents
are covered by the licence. I hope that the pool delivers a patent list at the
6 April meeting of our IPR Module.”